Journal | Impact Factor |
Phil Trans R Soc | 5.556 |
Proc R Soc B | 4.248 |
J Exp Biol | 2.981 |
J R Soc Interface | 3.621 |
TREE | 11.904 |
Funct Ecol | 3.699 |
Oikos | 2.97 |
BES | 2.917 |
MEPS | 2.631 |
AIAA J | 1.025 |
Exp Fluids | 1.854 |
J Avian Biol | 2.327 |
Auk | 2.303 |
Wilson Bull | 0.47 |
Nature | 31.434 |
Science | 28.103 |
PNAS | 9.38 |
PLoS Biology | 12.683 |
| |
24 June 2009
New Journal Impact Factors
Each year ISA publishes what is called "impact factors" for scientific journals (see Table below). The impact factor (IF) basically measures how often papers are cited that have been published in that journal during the last two years. The impact factor may not be a good guide about the importance of a paper, but I think we do, consciously or unconsciously, select where we publish our papers partly based on a journals IF. Just for fun, I assembled some of the new IFs for our favourite journals, and some others for control. The Journal of Avian Biology still comes out as top of the heap in the category ornithology, but the Auk is very close and has been so for quite some years now. Nature and Science are still around 30, Proc Roy Soc B has 4.25, JEB has 2.98, while J R Soc Interface has 3.62. The engineering journals are always much lower than the biology ones, with Exp Fluids at 1.85. At the medium level we find PloS Biology (12.68) and PNAS (9.38), which perhaps soon should get the honor of publishing some wind tunnel stuff.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Vindtunnelpek på gång till PNAS eller PLoS Biology alltså? Kul!
ReplyDeleteInte just nu, men det kommer nog snart... hoppas jag/Anders
ReplyDeleteI am sure you will like this vadlo journal impact factor cartoon!
ReplyDelete