A new paper, entitled Comparative aerodynamic performance of flapping flight in two bat species using time-resolved wake visualization from the lab was published today in the Journal of the Royal Society Interface, in which Florian Muijres and co-workers compare two species of bat with regard to their aerodynamic performance. Florian has developed very detailed methods for analyzing the wake properties, as recorded by time-resolved stereo PIV in the Lund University wind tunnel. The two species being compared, Glossophaga soricina and Leptopnycteris yerbabuenae, differ with a factor of 2 in mass and in some ecological respects. The Leptonycteris is a migrant while the Glossophaga is a resident, while they are both fruigivores that eat/drink nectar from plants using hovering flight. A measure of flight economics, the maximum lift to drag, was similar between the species, but it occurred at a higher speed in the larger species. This could reflect different performance optima between the two species associated with requirements for slow flight in Glossophaga and cruising/migratory flight in Leptonycteris. The wake geometry showed the typical bat features in both species, including reversed vortex loops at the transition between up-/downstroke and vortices shed from the wing roots.
Showing posts with label Glossophaga soricina. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Glossophaga soricina. Show all posts
03 March 2011
New paper about bat aerodynamics from Animal Flight Lab
A new paper, entitled Comparative aerodynamic performance of flapping flight in two bat species using time-resolved wake visualization from the lab was published today in the Journal of the Royal Society Interface, in which Florian Muijres and co-workers compare two species of bat with regard to their aerodynamic performance. Florian has developed very detailed methods for analyzing the wake properties, as recorded by time-resolved stereo PIV in the Lund University wind tunnel. The two species being compared, Glossophaga soricina and Leptopnycteris yerbabuenae, differ with a factor of 2 in mass and in some ecological respects. The Leptonycteris is a migrant while the Glossophaga is a resident, while they are both fruigivores that eat/drink nectar from plants using hovering flight. A measure of flight economics, the maximum lift to drag, was similar between the species, but it occurred at a higher speed in the larger species. This could reflect different performance optima between the two species associated with requirements for slow flight in Glossophaga and cruising/migratory flight in Leptonycteris. The wake geometry showed the typical bat features in both species, including reversed vortex loops at the transition between up-/downstroke and vortices shed from the wing roots.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)